utworzone przez Maja Balcerzak | 21, 09 , 2022 | EN, News EN
Directive 93/83/EEC and cable broadcasting By judgment of 8 September 2022 (ref. C-716/20), the CJEU ruled that Article 1(3) of Council Directive 93/83/EEC of 27 September 1993 on the coordination of certain rules concerning copyright and rights related to copyright...
utworzone przez Maja Balcerzak | 14, 09 , 2022 | EN, News EN
A dispute over one letter with music in the background Probably every Polish person knows the songs KOMBI band – not only those who were brought up in their heyday (70s-80s of XX c.). Few, however, realize that there are currently two bands on the Polish music...
utworzone przez Maja Balcerzak | 8, 09 , 2022 | EN, News EN
Why General Court does not support the “We do support” trademark? The judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 July 2022. In the Rimini Street, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (Case T 634/21) is a good illustration of what the...
utworzone przez Maja Balcerzak | 27, 05 , 2022 | EN, News EN
Who pays for a representative in litigation? An important issue for litigants is the question of the litigation economy. It concerns not only the amounts awarded for damages but also the reimbursement of costs to a successful party by a losing party. In this respect,...
utworzone przez Maja Balcerzak | 22, 05 , 2022 | EN, News EN
The mere request to stop infringements does not break the tolerance of the infringement In Case C-466/20, the CJEU commented on the 5-year time limit for tolerating trade mark infringements and the possibility of breaking it by issuing a cease and desist notice....
utworzone przez Maja Balcerzak | 5, 05 , 2022 | EN, News EN
Patent and provisional measures. CJEU: a judgment declaring validity is not necessary! In its judgment of 28 April 2022 (ref. C-44/21), the CJEU ruled that Article 9(1) of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the...
