Decision on the figurative sign representing the Palace of Culture and Science
On 6 February 2024, the Adjudicating Body of the Polish Patent Office handed down its decision on a motion to cancel the protection right for a figurative mark depicting the building of the Palace of Culture and Science in Warsaw:
The Palace was built in the 1950s, and although it is associated with the communist era, it has also become a symbol of Warsaw and a venue for cultural events.
The applicant alleged, among other things, that the mark lacked distinctiveness, was descriptive, had been applied for in bad faith, had entered customary use, and was contrary to the law, public policy, and moral standards (due to the historical and social value of the Palace of Culture and Science). The applicant also argued that the company holding the rights to the mark does not use the registered mark and the mark is not a distinctive designation of its services.
The Patent Office did not sustain any of the applicant’s objections and dismissed the application to cancel the mark protection. The grounds for the decision recognized, among other things, that the disputed mark is a graphic image, and a blurred image of a fanciful nature.
The limited liability company in charge of the Palace of Culture and Science also applied for several trademarks depicting the body of the building, as presented below.
The decision is in line with the predominant position of the Patent Office which emphasizes that in the case of architectural works, protection may be granted not to the body of the building itself, but to the graphic representation of a given architectural object, such as the building facade, and especially, any elements of a fanciful nature.

See more:
New stage of design protection in the EU
On the 23rd of October 2024, the European Parliament and the Council adopted Regulation 2024/2822 amending Regulation 6/2002, which introduces a number of changes to the EU design protection system. On the 18th of November 2024, Directive (EU) 2024/2823 of the...
CJEU on a trademark that may deceive the public as to the geographical origin (T-442/23)
In accordance with Article 1291(1)(12) of the Industrial Property Law and Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation 2017/1001, so-called deceptive signs, i.e. those that may confuse customers as to the nature, quality, or geographical origin of the goods, cannot be...
CJEU remarks on genuine use – judgement in case Dialoga (T‑1075/23)
The trademark protection system assumes that only those trademarks that are genuinely used are protected. If a trademark has not been used for a period of 5 years from the date of registration, any interested party has the right to file an application for...