IP Telegram: Recent Judgment of the EU General Court on the similarity of two graphic trade marks
Judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 25 October 2023 in Case T-773/22 on the similarity of two graphic trade marks which represent a dachshund
In October 2023, the General Court of the European Union delivered a landmark judgment reshaping the landscape of graphic trademark disputes when it ruled on the similarity of two graphic trade marks.
The riveting case involved two graphic trade marks which represent a dachshund.
Contorno Textil, SL, a Spanish company, faced off against Harmont & Blaine SpA, an Italian powerhouse, over the similarity of their graphic trademarks featuring the beloved dachshund.
On 8 November 2019, Contorno Textil, SL filed an EU trade mark application with EUIPO (in Class 25 – clothing/ footwear) for the following graphic sign:
Harmont & Blaine SpA, an Italian company, filed an opposition based on the earlier registration:
The Opposition Division upheld the opposition and the Board of Appeal subsequently dismissed the appeal – confirming the risk of confusion. Contorno Textil, SL brought an action before the EU General Court.
The EU General Court dismissed the action, confirming the existence of a risk of confusion.
The EU General Court pointed out, inter alia, that:
- the graphic elements of the conflicting marks overlap in that they represent a particularly recognisable breed of dog – the dachshund
- the colours and styling of the drawing that is used are not atypical and do not allow for a clear distinction between the dachshunds
The EU General Court underlined that the graphic element of the mark applied for is not decorative.
The Court also found low visual similarity and high conceptual similarity – while concluding that there was a likelihood of confusion.
The court noted the influence of the word element in enhancing the conceptual similarity when stating that the high conceptual similarity was also influenced by the fact that the word element 'Teckle’ (French for dachshund) was used.
💡 Takeaway: This judgment underscores the nuanced considerations in graphic trademark disputes, especially when dealing with iconic and recognizable elements like dog breeds. 🐶
The full text of CJEU’s judgment is available here:
See more:
New stage of design protection in the EU
On the 23rd of October 2024, the European Parliament and the Council adopted Regulation 2024/2822 amending Regulation 6/2002, which introduces a number of changes to the EU design protection system. On the 18th of November 2024, Directive (EU) 2024/2823 of the...
CJEU on a trademark that may deceive the public as to the geographical origin (T-442/23)
In accordance with Article 1291(1)(12) of the Industrial Property Law and Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation 2017/1001, so-called deceptive signs, i.e. those that may confuse customers as to the nature, quality, or geographical origin of the goods, cannot be...
CJEU remarks on genuine use – judgement in case Dialoga (T‑1075/23)
The trademark protection system assumes that only those trademarks that are genuinely used are protected. If a trademark has not been used for a period of 5 years from the date of registration, any interested party has the right to file an application for...